Strategic organizational change: the role of leadership, learning, motivation and productivity Steven H. Appelbaum Faculty of Commerce and Administration, Concordia University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Normand St-Pierre Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, Montreal, Quebec, Canada William Glavas Pratt and Whitney Canada, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Presents an overview of strategic organizational change (SOC) and its managerial impact on leadership, learning, motivation and productivity. Theoretical and empirical data presented are: the sources and determinants of strategic organizational change; the management implications of SOC; organizational leadership within the context of SOC; learning aspects of SOC; the impact of SOC on organizational and individual productivity; a model that explains the relationships between SOC, leadership, learning, motivation and productivity. Depicts strategic organizational change as an integrative process with all organizational elements such as human resources, systems and technologies being considered for successful change to occur. The proposed model for strategic organizational change is an attempt to link the software and hardware components of organizations. In view of the pressures being expected from the external environment and the critical vision of organizations, research suggests that top management needs to establish a ﬂexible and adaptive infrastructure that should lead contemporary and complex organizations to optimum levels of performance. The largest barrier to “change” is not changes to technologies and work processes but changes involving people.
For centuries philosophers have struggled with definitions of “change”, …To the ancient Greeks… tampering with the basic character of things – was, if not actually blasphemy, a sure path to disaster … In modern Western culture, “change” is a more malleable notion, a means to bend fate to one’s ends… (Kanter et al., 1992).
Critical determinants of organizational success and failure
The features of organizations that make for success are not always the same ones that lead to failure. Based on reports generated by professional consultants, it is possible to identify the speciﬁc factors that contribute most to success and failure. It is also possible to classify these factors as primarily environmental, structural, or management-oriented (Vecchio and Appelbaum, 1995). Although a successful organization need not possess all of the positive attributes, most successful organizations show more positive than negative attributes. Successful organizations tend to focus on customers and their needs. They invest in ways to improve sales and provide superior service to clients, and they do not forget that their customers and their customers’ needs underlie their organization’s existence. Successful organizations also adapt their structures to the needs of their missions. At the department level, controls may be simultaneously loose, in that managers have autonomy, and tight, insofar as speciﬁc performance goals may be set. Highly successful organizations often maintain a simple but appropriate structure that employs an adequate number of staff; they avoid empire building and padding with surplus staff. Also, entrepreneurship is encouraged within the divisions of the organization by rewarding successful innovation and encouraging risk taking (Vecchio and Appelbaum, 1995). A major management feature that can lead to success is a deliberate bias toward implementing solutions to problems. Management discourages “paralysis through analysis” of alternatives, and, instead, emphasizes satisﬁcing action that ensures goal attainment. Another management feature in successful ﬁrms is a commitment to the organization’s original arena of expertise. This is called “sticking to one’s knitting”. It involves staying close to what the organization knows how
Management Decision 36/5  289–301 © MCB University Press [ISSN 0025-1747]
References: Argyris, C. (1991), “Teaching smart people how to learn”, Harvard Business Review, May-June, pp. 99-109. Beatty, C., Lee, A. and Gloria, L. (1992), “Leadership among middle managers – an exploration in the context of technological change”, Human Relations, Vol. 45 No. 9, pp. 957-90. Beekin, R.I. (1989), “Assessing the effectiveness of sociotechnical interventions: antidote or fad”, Human Relations, Vol. 42, pp. 877-97. Beer, M. and Eisenstat, R.A. (1996), “Developing an organization capable of implementing strategy and learning”, Human Relations, Vol. 49 No. 5, pp. 597-617. Burke, W. and Litwin, G.H. (1992), “A causal model of organizational performance and change”, Journal of Management, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 523-45. Dutton, J.E. (1988), “Understanding strategic agenda building and its implications for managing change”, in Pondy, L.R., Boland, R.J. Jr and Thomas, H. (Eds), Managing Ambiguity and Change, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, pp. 127-44. Felkins, P.K., Chakiris, B.J. and Chakiris, K.N. (1993), Change Management: A Model for Effective Organizational Performance, Quality Resources, Chapters 1,3,8,10, White Plains, New York, NY. French, W.L. and Bell, C.H. (1978), Organizational Development: Behavioral Science Interventions for Organizational Improvement, 2nd edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, p. 14. Hitt, M., Keats, B.A. and Nixon, R.D. (1996), “Rightsizing: building and maintaining strategic leadership and long-term competitiveness”, Organizational Dynamics, pp. 18-32. Johns, G. (1983), Organizational Behavior: Understanding Life at Work, Scott, Foresman and Company, Glenview, IL, Chapter 17. Kanter, R.M., Stein, B.A. and Jick, T.D. (1992), The Challenge of Organizational Change, The Free Press, New York, NY, Chapter 6, 10. Katzenbach, J.R. (1996), “Real change management”, The McKinsey Quarterly, No. 1, pp. 148-63. Kren, L. (1992), “The monitoring effects of locus of control on performance incentives and participation”, Human Relations, Vol. 45 No. 9, pp. 991-1012. Lawler, E. (1994), “Effective rewards systems: strategy diagnosis and design”, in Howard and Associates (Eds), Diagnosis for Organizational Change, The Guilford Press, New York, NY, pp. 210-38. Porras, J.I. and Berg, P.O. (1978), “The impact of organization development”, Academy of Management Review, No. 3, pp. 249-66. Robbins, S. P. (1983), Organizational Theory, The Structure & Design of Organizations, PrenticeHall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Chapter 15.
[ 300 ]
Steven H. Appelbaum, Normand St-Pierre and William Glavas Strategic organizational change: the role of leadership, learning, motivation and productivity Management Decision 36/5  289–301
Rogers, W. R. and Byham, W.C. (1994), “Diagnosing organizational cultures for realignment”, in Howard and Associates (Eds), Diagnosis for Organizational Change, The Guilford Press, New York, pp. 179-209. Rummler, G. (1996), “In search of the holy”, Training & Development, pp. 26-32. Sleeth, R., Johnston, G. and Wallace, R. (1996), “The effective leader as a link between tasks and people”, SAM Advanced Management Journal, pp. 16-21. Trahant, W. and Burke, W. (1996), “Creating a change reaction: how understanding organizational dynamics can ease re-engineering”, National Productivity Review, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 37-46. Van Buren, M.E. and Werner, J.M. (1996), “High performance work systems”, Business and Economic Review, Vol. 43 No. 1, pp. 15-23. Vecchio, R.P. and Appelbaum, S.H. (1995), Managing Organizational Behaviour Dryden, , Toronto, Chapters 10, 19.
Volberda, H.W. (1992), Organizational Flexibility Change and Preservation: A Flexibility Audit & Redesign Model, Wolters - Noordhoff, Chapter 3, 4, 6. Walton, E. and Nadler, D. (1994), “Diagnosis for organization design”, in Howard and Associates (Eds), Diagnosis for Organizational Change, The Guilford Press, New York, NY, pp. 85-105. Wiggenhorn, W. (1990), “Motorola U: when training becomes an education”, Harvard Business Review, No. 4, pp. 71-83. Wilson, D. (1992), A Strategy of Change: Concepts and Controversies in the Management of Change, Routledge, New York, NY, Chapters 1-4. Zammuto, R. and O’Conner, E.J. (1992), “Gaining advanced manufacturing technologies’ beneﬁts: the role of organizational design and culture”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 701-28.
1 Would you agree with the author that the largest barrier to change is people, not technology and work processes? 2 If planned change is the key to organization success, should people hold a deﬁned change planning role?
[ 301 ]
Please join StudyMode to read the full document