Philosophy: Human and Terrorism

Topics: Human, Terrorism, Iraq War Pages: 3 (1193 words) Published: September 26, 2013
Terrorism involves the unlawful use of violence or threat against particular people with the intention of gaining political advantage or change. It is a directed attack or threat to the people of a country for the purposes of influencing the politics and political policies of the country (Benvindo, 2010). It is aimed at forcing or imposing the government to accept to certain political demands. The moral justification of terrorism is a debate that leaves many people in a state of great disagreement when both the followers and opponents are brought together. However, the end results of terrorism contradict and obscure any possible existence of moral justifications of the act. Terrorism will never be justified. Terrorists attacks are a violation of human dignity, involves innocent people and an illegitimate use of force. The attacks and violent threats are often aimed at changing the positions of governments or administrations. In many situations, terrorism attacks target many innocent people, children, and helpless women. First, this is a violation of the human dignity. It is an action that fails to respect the existence of a person as a being that needs to be responsible for each of their individual actions (McGoldrick, 2004). Human beings ought to exist and live as a means to their own end. According to Kant, it is a universal law to treat humans not only as means, but also as ends in the process of treating humanity with dignity. Human beings are not mere objects to beused for the purposes of others. Therefore, it is immoral and unjustified to claim innocent deaths through violent attacks in order to achieve certain demands and goals (Shanahan, 2005). Professionals such as, Morris and Frey, agree with Kant’s position on terrorism. They believe that no amount of justification can validate furthering the ends of a small group of people by killing many and destroying a great deal of interest of the majority (Shanahan, 2005). Fear and suffering are stimulated...

References: Benvindo, J. Z. (2010). On the limits of legal rationality: Balancing and judicial activism in deconstruction. Berlin: Springer.
McGoldrick, D. (2004). From "9-11" to the "Iraq War 2003": International law in an age of complexity. New York: Hart.
Shanahan, T. (2005). Philosophy 9/11: Thinking about the war on terrorism. Chicago: Open Court.
Waller, B. (2011). Can Terrorism Ever Be Justified?: Consider Ethics: Theory, Readings and Contemporary Issues. Toronto/Montreal: Pearson Longman.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • terrorism Essay
  • Terrorism and Evan Parker Philosophy Essay
  • Essay about Philosophy
  • Philosophy Essay
  • Terrorism Research Paper
  • Essay about Philosophy
  • Essay on Philosophy

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free