TERM PAPER ON
ORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGIES AND CHANGE
MOHAMMAD ALI JINNAH UNIVERSITY
The purpose of this research is to summarize several strategies and describe how these strategies can help bring about changes in an organization. The authors show how different strategies can be used for successful implementation of change process. The article compares the four level strategies, namely functional level strategy, business level strategy, corporate level strategy and global strategy.
There are many strategies to bring about a change in an organization but the most commonly used strategies are summarized in this article. An organization is a group of people working together to achieve a common goal. As change is a continuous process therefore organizations often need to bring about changes and innovations with in the organization. Change is brought about by internal and external factors. The desired change in any organization cannot be brought about without implementing organizational change strategies. The whole process requires evaluating, planning, implementing, benchmarking and monitoring the goals and objectives of the organization.
Functional-level strategies are concerned with coordinating the functional areas of the organization e.g. marketing, finance, human resources, production, research and development, etc. so that each functional area upholds and contributes to individual business-level strategies and the overall corporate-level strategy. This involves coordinating the various functions and operations needed to design, manufacturer, deliver, and support the product or service of each business within the corporate portfolio. Functional strategies are primarily concerned with:
• Efficiently utilizing specialists within the functional area. • Integrating activities within the functional area (e.g., coordinating advertising, promotion, and marketing research in marketing; or purchasing, inventory control, and shipping in production/operations). • Assuring that functional strategies mesh with business-level strategies and the overall corporate-level strategy.
Functional strategies are frequently concerned with appropriate timing. For example, advertising for a new product could be expected to begin sixty days prior to shipment of the first product. Production could then start thirty days before shipping begins. Raw materials, for instance, may require that orders are placed at least two weeks before production is to start. Thus, functional strategies have a shorter time orientation than either business-level or corporate-level strategies. Accountability is also easiest to establish with functional strategies because results of actions occur sooner and are more easily attributed to the function than is possible at other levels of strategy. Lower-level managers are most directly involved with the implementation of functional strategies.
Strategies for an organization may be categorized by the level of the organization addressed by the strategy. Corporate-level strategies involve top management and address issues of concern to the entire organization. Business-level strategies deal with major business units or divisions of the corporate portfolio. Business-level strategies are generally developed by upper and middle-level managers and are intended to help the organization achieve its corporate strategies. Functional strategies address problems commonly faced by lower-level managers and deal with strategies for the major organizational functions e.g., marketing, finance, and production are considered relevant for achieving the business strategies and supporting the corporate-level strategy.
BUSINESS LEVEL STRATEGIES
Business-level strategies are thus primarily concerned with:
➢ Coordinating and integrating unit activities so they conform to organizational strategies for achieving synergy. ➢ Developing distinctive...
References: Digman, L. Strategic Management. Houston: Dame, 1997
Hambrick, D., I. MacMillan, and D. Day. "Strategic Attributes and Performance in the BCG Matrix." Academy of Management Journal (1982): 500–509.
Kroll, M., P. Wright, and R. Heiens. "The Contribution of Product Quality to Competitive Advantage: Impacts on Systematic Variance and Unexplained Variance in Returns." Strategic Management Journal 20 (1999): 375–384.
Porter, M. Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: Free Press, 1985.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document